Patterns of Violence in Rural Communities

[Note: We do not know if the full article to be published in Criminology will reference violence against rural women in the context of patriarchal rural communities. ]

LSU Professor Dissects Patterns of Violence in Rural Communities
Findings suggest that civic participation is key to cutting rates of violent crime

Source:  http://appl003.lsu.edu/unv002.nsf/(NoteID)/E00677A500B207F58625746C0070CFAB?OpenDocument

Matthew Lee, professor of sociology at LSU, has taken an intense look at the phenomenon of violence in rural areas. His article, “Civic Community in the Hinterland: Toward a Theory of Rural Social Structure and Violence,” will be published in the prestigious journal “Criminology.” This article serves as the culmination to Lee’s prestigious Career Award, presented to him by the National Science Foundation in 2003.

“This is what I call a ‘civic community perspective’ on rural violence,” said Lee.

“Past research in the area was narrow in scope and had not found a way to integrate various ideas on the different avenues of civic involvement. I have tried to tie all this together in the hopes of developing a well-rounded theory toward understanding the problem.”

Rural areas traditionally known for high rates of violent crime include Mississippi’s Delta Region, parts of Appalachia and Louisiana’s Florida parishes.

Lee found that three major factors play a significant role in determining the level of violence in a rural setting:

  1. The stability of the local population and the extent to which community members are “locally invested”;
  2. The existence of a participatory civic culture; and
  3. The presence of a strong, economically independent middle class.

“When these three factors have been eroded or compromised, the conditions are favorable for violent crime to flourish,” said Lee.

The stability of a local population looks at factors such as home ownership versus rental rates, levels of long-term residency and turnover and strength of social networks within the community. “Perhaps not surprisingly, places that have high levels of rental occupancy and a transient citizen base are more likely to experience increased violent crime than a community with high home ownership and a stable population base,” said Lee.

Participatory civic cultures, including widespread engagement in groups such as the Elks Club, the Parent-Teacher Association or even the Girl Scouts as well as religious institutions, also bode well for a community. According to the article, juvenile homicide rates are lower in rural communities where the rate of adherence to civic participation is high.

Finally, the presence of a robust middle-class is closely tied to the idea of locally oriented capitalism, or community-run businesses. The economic investment into one’s own community generally instigates a great deal of buy-in from the rest of the area. Ownership of small business also has a tendency to instill the urge for other forms of civic participation in proprietors, as they generally have more time and money to sink into such endeavors.

“Basically, the more stable, secure and involved a rural community is, the less likely they are to be plagued with problems of violence,” said Lee.

Leave a comment

Filed under rural violence

----

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s